Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:53
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The BEST exercise for heart health, according to top US cardiac surgeon - Times of India
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
If you used Pocket to save links, these alternatives will serve you well - Android Police
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
As it happened: GC showdown in the high mountains at stage 7 of Critérium du Dauphiné - Cyclingnews
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Since the Brits can't steer their oil tanker, what makes them think they can take on Russia?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
ChatGPT Just Got 'Absolutely Wrecked' at Chess, Losing to a 1970s-Era Atari 2600 - CNET
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is there a possibility that we are living in a simulation and that there is a concept of rebirth?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.